I often tell my students, “Those who do not understand the
mistakes of the past are doomed to repeat them.” I say this when we are reading
historical fiction. My kids don’t get history class.
Once invested in that end, it was a challenge to give them a
similarly profound reason to read science fiction. “It’s about the future!”
they would argue. “It hasn’t even happened yet. We can’t learn from this!”
“You can learn tons!” I would say. “Imagery and plot and
conflict and… Goodness I’ve just lost them.”
Middle schoolers need more – or at least mine do. So, when
it came to science fiction, I explained: “This writer has imagined the
future! It’s our duty to decide if we want that future or not! If we don’t do
something, it’s coming!”
At the time, this seemed a clever ploy to get 6th
grade quiet, focused, and ready to read. But in reviewing education articles
for this post, I found it is a disconcertingly true possibility.
Isaac Asimov, in 1951, wrote a short story called, “The Fun
They Had.” In case you haven’t read it, you can find it here.
In this story, Asimov writes of a future where two kids find
a real book… and they’re THRILLED about it! They’re thrilled because they hate
school. Counter-intuitive, I know.
In fact, they hate the “mechanical teacher” (robot) that is
meant to educate them from their home. Margie particularly hates it because the
robot keeps giving her tests! She becomes so inundated with assessments that a
County Inspector must be brought in to fix the system.
Regardless, the book they find is a story about education in
our recent past. With such revelations as teachers “having a special building”
to teach kids and kids being taught by a human, Margie can only daydream about,
“the fun they had.”
Now, consider our present! According to the Washington Post,
“Virtual schools are multiplying, but some question their educational value.”
Just as Asimov showed us in his short story, it would be a
great detriment to our kids if virtual schooling became the norm. Consider how
much would be lost, especially in terms of social interaction!
No comments:
Post a Comment