Wednesday, October 12, 2016

Commodore John Rodgers: A story of Title 1 funding

The entryway to Commodore John Rodgers Elementary School, located in the Butcher’s Hill neighborhood of east Baltimore, proudly displays their students who have perfect attendance and the latest school project of a certain grade level. Like the way I remember my own public elementary school, the hallways were decorated with brightly colored paper and the latest classroom artwork.

It was one of my favorite schools to visit when I moved to Baltimore in 2014 to work for an AmeriCorps program called The Choice Program. My team worked out of the Department of Social Services and served youth on the east side of Baltimore City who were considered at-risk of being placed in foster care. Part of my job was to visit a caseload of 15 youth at school twice a week, so I was able to view the daily workings of a number of mostly east Baltimore schools, and not all of them looked or felt as welcoming as Commodore John Rodgers.

It was somewhat shocking to learn from WYPR a couple weeks ago that in 2010 Commodore was one of the lowest ranked schools, not just in Baltimore, but in all of Maryland. The story explained that the school had applied and received a federal School Improvement Grant, which is often referred to as ‘turn-around funding’ and is available to all schools operating in the bottom 5 percent of the nation’s poorest schools. A new principal came in, armed with an extra $2 million a year, and was incredibly successful in turning the school around. So successful, in fact, that Commodore is no longer eligible for the extra funding.

The school specializes in accelerating learning for students who are levels behind where they need to be, as well as creating a school culture among students, parents and teachers. The youth I knew who was attending Commodore was two grades behind, and while she still struggled with math (mainly because it was her first class and getting to school on time was not her forte,) she did improve in English. She and her younger siblings also participated in several after school activities and sports, and her parents attended different nighttime shows and events at the school.

In my experience, it was one of the easier schools to meet with teachers or administration. The adults at the school seemed to really care about the students, and wanted them to succeed. Commodore had a different feeling to it than a lot of the Baltimore City schools I visited, and after hearing this story, the extra effort that went into the school seems centered around the additional funding.

It hasn’t been that long since Commodore received the additional funding, and dramatically improved test scores and decreased absenteeism. According to the article, Title 1 funding doesn’t work for every school that receives it, and then goes on to list several reasons why Commodore did succeed – a change in atmosphere, enrollment and absenteeism. But it doesn’t say what makes these changes different from a school that received funding and wasn’t so successful. Did that school just need more time? A better leader? More community involvement?

While there might not be one formula to turn-around our poorest schools, the principal of Commodore did bring up an interesting point at the end of his interview asking if “federal funds would be better spent fueling his school’s progress a little longer as opposed to being directed at an entirely new school.”

It is hard to know where Commodore will end up in the next 5 years. Will it keep it's high enrollment and attendance rates it's worked hard to obtain? And is it fair to continue to obligate funding while other schools have more of a need, and should be given the opportunity to succeed? The real test to Commodore's success is in the years ahead, without additional funding, rather than in the work they've accomplished since 2010 -- and whether or not they can keep their progress moving forward. 


Fixing failing schools: do school improvement grants build sustainable change
http://wypr.org/post/fixing-failing-schools-do-school-improvement-grants-build-sustainable-change#stream/0




No comments: