Performance Pay: Coming to a City Near You!

A piece in the Baltimore Sun about a week ago stated that a state legislative committee had put a hold on "a regulation that would require student achievement be at least 50 percent of a teacher's evaluation in Maryland." This is because the committee feels the State Board of Education has started to place more specifics into the proposal than were initially proposed. According to Paul Pinsky, the law states that student achievement should be a "significant" portion of a teacher's evaluation but does not specify a percent. There is some concern that if this new teacher evaluation is not enacted, than Maryland may lose some of our Race to the Top money.

My point is not to discuss whether the legislature was justified in being surprised that the board of education had to put a numerical value to "significant." My point is to discuss performance pay. I have an aunt who is, as of last June, a retired veteran teacher. She once told my dad, regarding tenure, "I'm not sure I could go to work each day and know that I could be fired if I didn't do a good job." Obviously, that line is a little unpolished and probably doesn't completely reflect what my aunt actually thinks. However, I think there is a sentiment there that is shared by a lot of teachers.

Everyone agrees that we want good teachers teaching. However, we don't seem to want to fire bad teachers. At the same time we don't want to reward good teachers with more money. How is it fair for a teacher who consistently moves her students two years in reading gets the same pay as a teacher who pops in a video everyday and doesn't move their children much at all? I think we are sending the wrong message to teachers, you can work very hard or work very little and you'll make the same money.

Performance pay has many problems to work out to ensure that it is a fair and valid form of measurement. We need to make sure that regardless of how performance pay is awarded, it is sensitive to all the other factors that can influence students performance. However, teachers need to know that performance pay is going to happen. As a political issue its a no brainer. It is very hard for the public to accept that teachers should not be held accountable for their performance on the job, when nearly every other employed person in the world is accountable for their performance on the job. It is just a difficult argument to make and the public wants accountability from schools and that means teachers.

As I was typing this I just received an email saying another tentative contract has been reached. This brings us right back to where I began. Performance pay is going to happen, today, tomorrow, a year from now. The public supports the idea and teachers should too. Good teachers stand to make the kind of money that make teaching comparable with other bachelor level careers. Furthermore, it just makes sense, teachers should be held accountable for the job they do in the classroom. It is time for teachers to decide whether they want to be part of the process of shaping performance pay or have it forced upon them by a law. Either way, performance pay is coming to a city near you.

Charter School Proposal on Tuesday

The Baltimore Sun reported that Dr. Alonso will be a part of a meeting on Tuesday to hear the plans for new charter schools in the city. Amongst the 7 charter schools and 4 transformation schools, I am watching two of the schools most closely. There will be a proposal for an all boys high school and an all girls high school. We talked in class about the advantages and disadvantages of each, and I have been watching the way the two genders interact in my class. I have noticed that if I work with a group of girls or with a group boys separate from the opposite, they are different. The boys, especially, tend to calm down a lot when there are no girls looking.

Boys and girls learn in different ways. Girls mature more quickly, and boys need to be more hands on. Here in Baltimore, I have noticed too that students get sexual at an earlier age, sometimes unaware of the risks and repercussions of sex at a young age. The drawbacks, of course, include a lack of social interaction with the opposite sex, but it is important to consider that academically students may thrive in this situation.

As a product of single sex education, I believe that single sex education made a difference for me. I have not been able to find any examples of a public school with single gender, or to find their level of success. The research that I have found though states that if teachers are properly trained in how to teach a single sex classroom, they can capitalize on the situation and make the most out of it to raise student achievement. The research states that children will not become more gender restricted, but instead will be given more opportunities to explore and express their actual interests.

It will be interesting to see how the board votes on these two high schools, since there are so few charter high schools. If they are approved and can prove to be successful, they could change the way education is done on a much larger scale.

Dropout Rate Drops (along with expectations?)

You probably received the email from Alonso today highlighting the fact that our Baltimore City African American males are leading the pack in decreasing the dropout rate while increasing the graduation rate. In the past three years, Baltimore City's dropout rate has decreased by 56% while the graduation rate if up 10%. Our African American male students are breaking these statistics with 59% and 12.4%, respectively. While I could not be happier that more students are staying in school and receiving their diploma, these statistics make me question if Maryland's requirements are rigorous enough.

As educators, we debate about standardized testing endlessly. Personally, I feel that some sort of test to compare results between schools, districts, and states is necessary to ensure our students are learning what we need them to learn. The Baltimore Sun highlights the decrease in Baltimore City's dropout rate stating that state officials believe the HSAs to have increased the "standards for students and enabled more to get a diploma." Although I believe that statement to be true, I feel that the second half is a bit vague. If you check out the Maryland Report Card for Baltimore City, only 68% of our seniors have actually passed the Algebra / Data Analysis HSA. However, 100% have met the requirement for graduation. Within that gap comes Bridge Projects: the get out of jail free card for our students. Not surprisingly, most see it that way too.

This year I am teaching an Algebra / Data Analysis HSA Mastery class for junior non - passers that need to pass. All of my students already know the ins and outs of the Bridge Projects and most see no point in attempting to take and pass the HSA for the sixth time when they can just complete the projects and still meet the requirements.

With that all said, I love that Baltimore City's dropout rate is continually decreasing, but are we still holding our students to high expectations when we give them an easy alternative when they cannot pass the required examinations to graduate? Should we take away that option and fear that dropout rates once again increase? Obviously there is no right answer to this inevitable struggle of balance, but finding a way to ensure students are receiving the knowledge they need to succeed in the real world should be the main priority in all schools.

"Culture of Poverty" Times Article

In continuing with my earlier post’s theme of contextualizing the school system within a larger system of poverty, a recent New York Times article revisited an academic concept termed the “culture of poverty” that defines institutional limits of habits, beliefs, and opportunities for populations living under the poverty line. While initially attacked when the sociology was first introduced in the sixties, the article goes on to highlight the reemergence of an academic credence for the cultural analysis of populations stagnated by the forces of poverty. This is an interesting idea and, I believe, very applicable to our students and their demographic conditions.

The article mentions the original controversial research that sought to explore how ideas and behavioral trends among groups of people could ensnare urban black families through self-perpetuating moral deficiencies. Clearly, the moral character of an entire race is not a viable subject of debate (as it was in the original research), and the contemporary approach to the research of cultural systems within poverty is more accurate in the study of institutional racism and isolation. With an approach to culture as “shared understandings” among a population, there are interesting studies mentioned in the article that have to do with a neighborhood’s shared perceptions of community action and thought; a “broken window” syndrome that has to do with larger forces perpetuating habits, thoughts, and beliefs that isolate populations in a cycle of poverty. It is important to keep in mind that this is different from the previous (discredited) research that primarily attributed racial characteristics to a lack of self-improvement and mobility within impoverished communities.

With my students as my reference into the Baltimore school district and urban education in general – read: a limited perspective – I recognize demeaning cultural habits and beliefs that are not racial in origin, but representative of poverty and class. The willingness to analyze cultural ideologies that reinforce and at times even celebrate an acceptance of impoverished conditions deserves support while considering the place and role of education within that system. Studies of a “culture of poverty” do not imply a lack of possibility through abstract forces that work in tandem against the individual or family. Rather, studies of a “culture of poverty” represent the analysis of class ideology as a means of exploring increasing rates of poverty and the experiences of living, working, and learning in the studied environment. This has huge implications for educational reform when considering the environment and culture of our students in Baltimore City, and how best to serve their needs.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/18/us/18poverty.html?_r=1&src=me&ref=homepage

teach.gov

I was surfing the web this Sunday, looking at different articles about the recent movie Waiting for Superman that we have talked about so much. I found a website called Teach.gov. This is the first I’ve heard of this website, and I was amazed by what I found.

This website is attempting to change the image of teaching. Teaching is sometimes seen as an easy job, or a job for those who can’t do. It is seen as a temporary stepping stone, or a job for the less talented. For what it’s worth, the web site is trying to inspire our generation to consider becoming teachers. Among the many reasons to become a teacher listed on the website includes be a leader, shape tomorrow, help under-served communities, and build a career with chances for advancement.

Additionally, the website features video interviews with teachers, logically, and then less logically, stars like Oprah. Oprah talks about her favorite teacher and how she was inspired by her.

I find this website to be a bit underwhelming when you consider the conversation that is taking place across the country. We talk about how great the need is for more teachers, for enthusiastic teachers, dedicated to a mission. Although, I appreciate the web-site's attempt to reach out, it does not seem like enough to get more teachers.

As a country, our education system is in crisis and more needs to be done to recruit teachers capable of achieving big changes and believing that the change is possible. Perhaps the web site is a good first step, but it is not enough. The implications for Baltimore are pretty clear. The website seems friendly enough for inviting new teachers, but how many people are looking at this, realizing that their every dream is to become a teacher in Baltimore City? Probably not many. It is not enough of an attempt to attract the people that we need. It is not convincing nor is it appealing. More has to be done to recruit the kind of high-quality teachers that we need.

Charter Schools and Unions: An Unlikely Marriage?

In a recent article published in the New York Times, Despite Image, Union Leader Backs School Change, a different perspective is presented about Randi Weingarten. Weingarten, the new union leader of the American Federation of Teachers was depicted as "a foaming satanic beast" in Waiting For "Superman" according for Variety. It is almost an undisputed fact that Teacher's Unions were not portrayed in the most positive of lights in the film. Of course, Teacher's Unions and Randi Weingarten are presented in synonymous terms, and the uneducated viewer may have walked away from the film with skewed perspective of the intentions and desired outcomes of Ms. Weingarten.

The Times article emphasizes the following major points: recently Weingarten has been presented as diametrically opposed to charter schools; she wrote a written rebuttal to Waiting for "Superman;" earlier this year, Weingarten proposed that teacher's evaluations be partially tied to student achievement (aka test scores). What is not as readily acknowledged is that Weingarten has a responsibility to her union members - many of whom are concerned with job security more than they are concerned with educational reform.

As an educator it is difficult to imagine acting in your own interest rather than in the interest of your students; however, the waters are so murky around this issue that it is hard to say what is best for students. Is it a stronger Union? Is it more emphasis on test scores? Less emphasis on test scores? As suggestions and ideas are continually raised, it becomes difficult to choose which will be the best for our children. Can a solution, given the individual state's power over education, work on a national level? As these questions swirl in my mind it is almost impossible to choose a side to form an unwavering allegiance to.

Perhaps the most disappointing part of the article is the realization that Weingarten, like many others, was only partially shown in the film. Steve Barr, the founder of the Green Dot charter school, pointed out one of the major weaknesses of the film: it doesn't show any positive examples of charter schools and unions working together.

This is an interesting point. The way I see it there are two major groups of people who saw the film: those who understand charter schools and those who don't. Waiting for "Superman" addresses issues of educational inequity - this is a positive thing. However, did it really do it in a way that was most accessible to the general public and most honest to the people in the film? This is debatable. And that makes me nervous.

Given the recent push in Baltimore by our own union leaders to ratify a new contract, I find this article about union leadership particularly pertinent. Unions, especially in school districts like Baltimore City, serve the purpose of representing teachers, but are called to do so in a way that will allow teachers to best serve our students. Whether it's a film, a union representative, or a new contract, Baltimore teachers must be willing to stand up for what is best for the children that we teach. Their needs should take priority over ours.

Michelle Rhee Steps Down: The Future of Education Reform

Today, Michelle Rhee, the Chancellor of DC Public Schools stepped down. Rhee has long been a divisive figure in DCPS often clashing with the local union as a result of a new evaluation system and the firing of more than 200 DCPS teachers. The news on its face is a setback to all the reforms that Rhee instituted in her 3 year tenure as Chancellor.

However, her replacement, Kaya Henderson shares much in common with Rhee in terms of the new evaluation system. Rhee and Henderson also worked together at The New Teacher Project. They share the belief that the teacher is an important component to student success. Vincent Gray who defeated Adrian Fenty in the primaries and is thought to be the next Mayor of DC mentions in the Washington Post that ""We cannot and will not return to the days of incrementalism". This seems to indicate that the reforms of the last three years are here to stay, at least for the time being.

The majority of news coverage seems to suggest that Rhee's divisive nature and her association with a lame duck mayor are the reason for her departure. However, the New York Times casually slips in another possible reason for Rhee's transition "Replacing Ms. Rhee, who is Korean-American, with Ms. Henderson, who is black, is expected to ease racial tensions." It is interesting to note that the New York Times fails to elaborate on this point, nor does anyone else interviewed comment on this as a factor. To what extent does the race of the leader of a school system affect student achievement? I am not aware of any data that answers that question. I do think it has more to do with the political climate than anything else.

Does this mean that Rhee has failed or that she is out of the field of education reform? I don't believe so. I think that what Rhee has done is nothing less than bold and innovative. This is a turning point in her career as an education reformer. I predict that Rhee will continue in education reform at a more holistic and national scale. She seems to be at her best when she shakes up the status quo with her take charge attitude. The question is, can she build the political capital to be a staying force in the long run.

So what does this mean for Baltimore? It puts a little bit of pressure on Alonso and his tenure in Baltimore. Rhee's departure also narrows the lens of school reform to those at the top? Just how much of a difference does the school leader make? What has Alonso done in Baltimore and will he stay?

Community Uplift Important in Education Reform

There is an interesting article headlining yesterday's edition of the New York Times. It features a brief analysis of Geoffrey Canada’s Harlem Children’s Zone and its community based approach to educational reform. The article also features briefs on the charter school place in education and recent presidential movements toward a more symbiotic uplift of depressed areas and schools. It’s an interesting read and I’ve included the link below.

Through practice, class, and observation I’ve come to believe that our educational system is certainly not an institution that functions in a bubble, insulated from larger outside forces. Rather, our schools are neighborhood landmarks and staples of the communities they exist within and serve. This can be wonderful for communities and schools that reflect achievement gap-type benefits, and punitive for those that continually suffer through their environment. The adage of our schools as a microcosm of society is relevant in this discussion, although not on the scale we typically associate it with. For the most part, schools exist as a microcosm of smaller, more community-representative societies – the neighborhoods where they draw their populations, the districts where they draw their support and resources, and the regions where they draw their emphasized place and funding.

I’ve often found myself frustrated in the classroom as I’ve come to associate classroom instruction as only a small piece of larger social issues that actively counter the efforts of teachers working in high poverty communities. A root issue of poverty defines our daily struggle and negatively impacts educational achievement more than what gets discussed. True, education plays a major role in that struggle, but the conditions with which cause our students to suffer on every level imaginable easily trump, counter, or at the very least work to impede the strides that could be made in a classroom every day. No less daunting of a task to overcome is a culture of social frustration and mistrust that often fails to recognize education as a viable option for improvement – perhaps rightly so considering the quality of and experiences associated with local public education.

Enter Geoffrey Canada and his experiment transforming the Harlem neighborhood through a blending of social services and high quality public education. Canada’s goals are lofty but right on. The uplift of our school system requires the transformation of the areas in which our worst-performing schools exist. These are not exclusive endeavors but mutually reinforcing movements – a full assault on poverty is necessary as the issues are so interwoven and complex that to address them in piecemeal fashion will fail through countering forces. Unfortunately, the applicability of such individual attention on a national scale, not to mention the dedicated effort and money required makes the experiment seem doomed to locality. Critiques brought up in the article are interesting: lack of real correlation between social services and student achievement (and therefore undeserving of federal dollars), funding (Canada relies on a significant portion of private support), and limited research supporting overall effectiveness.

Regardless of detractors, it’s my belief that the provision of basic services for families and students are necessary for the rates of success we need to see in the classroom. A solution must exist somewhere in an optimal blend of social service provision and charter school freedom with a dash of private sector support – basically an effort to address all from all. Lofty, naïve, inexperienced, check all the above. Still what we’re working so hard for in the classrooms won’t be fully realized until we are willing to recognize and provide for people in all types of conditions. Obama, Arne, Canada, KIPP, and other organizations realize the importance of community uplift as part of the school reform movement and are putting out grants and reform efforts to that effect (supported in the article). Even so, it gets stickier when trying to develop specific plans, allocate funds, and rally support.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/13/education/13harlem.html?_r=1&hp

Test Scores that Influence Reform May Be Inflated

Yesterday in the New York Times, there was a article called "On New York School Tests, Warning Signs Ignored." The article discusses that New York has placed a big focus on standarized testing in the schools. The test scores are used to determine whether or not policies are working and they are also used to determine which teachers receive tenure, which schools get funding, and which principals and teachers get bonuses. Although New York's scores have been increasing, there have been flaws in the process. "Evidence had been mounting for some time that the state's tests, which have formed the basis of almost every school reform effort of the past decade, has serious flaws." After years of having simlar tests and releasing the past test questions, the tests have become short and predictable. Teachers are now only focusing on the reading and math subjects and people are wondering if it is considered real learning if you know what is going to be on the tests. Some believe that authentic learning is not going on. There is evidence that the scores are now inflated and the scores do not truly reflect the proficiency level of New York's students.

This topic of standarized testing seems to always arise in conversation when discussing reform, measuring student's knowledge, and also measuring the effectiveness of teachers. I agree that some type of measurement is necessary, but it seems that so much focus on standardized tests can bring negative effects or even produce false information reflecting the academic levels of our students. If test scores are going to be a big factor in determining teacher effectiveness and student knowledge, the tests need to be accurately measure student understanding. We cannot just look at scores; we need to look at what they really mean. The questions on the tests need to meet national standards and we need to make sure that they hold our students to high standards. If we make the tests like the MSA and HSA easy to pass, then more students will be able to graduate, but the tests will hold no value. I do not know what the best way to measure students learning is, but if we are going to use standarized tests to do so, we need to make sure they are being using in a logical and meaningful way. I think that if we are truly going to improve education for our students in Baltimore, then we need to think about what the data from the MSA and HSA means. They should not just be a random number-I honestly do not know what getting a 412 on the Algebra HSA or a 400 on the Biology HSA means. I think that teachers have started to teach towards the tests and focus on HSA topics and problems to prepare our students. I think that doing so can take away from the educational experience. Recently I have heard that soon the MSA and HSA will not be used to measure our students' academic knowledge and that new tests will be implemented (and have heard that they are more aligned to the national standards). I think that we should hold our students in Baltimore to the same expectations as students all around the country.

Deflating the Value of a Baltimore City Diploma

This past Wednesday The Baltimore Sun published an article entitled “Md. high school graduation rate climbs.” The article explores the issue of bridge projects vs. actually passing the HSAs; which student groups perform well on the standardized tests and which don’t; and, perhaps most importantly, which whether the tests are a valid measure of student academic performance.

The article claims that “state officials believe that the High School Assessments have only raised the standards for students and enabled more to get a diploma.” However, the data shows that the number of students who did not graduate this year due to a failure to meet testing requirements tripled. In addition, the number of students completing Bridge projects increased from 5.8 to 8.1 percent this year.

While I don’t teach a course that is governed by an HSA exam, I do work at a school that serves high school students, and thus am dedicated to these children receiving a rigorous and competitive education. Matthew Joseph, of Advocates for Children and Youth, is quoted in the article stating that “they lowered the standard, basically … since nearly 100 percent of students are meeting the testing requirements, what is the value of having them at all?” I couldn’t agree more. If a test does not truly measure a student’s ability to perform in that content area, what purpose do they serve?

Can we as a teachers and a district celebrate if the value of the diploma we are sending our kids away with does not truly represent a meaningful level of skill?

I do not blame the test, the state officials, the teachers whose hands are tied by the rigidity of teaching a tested subject. Education is not the place for blame, rather it is the place for action. We must ask ourselves, as individuals committed to the cause of raising the bar for the children of Baltimore City, what needs to happen now? A more rigorous test, more extensive bridge projects, or do we abolish these removed forms of measurement altogether?

Most importantly, how do we ensure that children graduating from this school district, city, and state have more to show than a piece of paper that says Diploma?

Bullying in America

On CNN, Anderson Cooper held a town hall meeting to discuss bullying in America. CNN felt the conversation was appropriate with October being Bullying Awareness Month. The conversation included psychologists, students who were victims and bullies, and parents. The conversation touched on lack of teacher training to handle bullying, bullying through social media, communication between parents and the school about bullying and bystanders who witness bullying but do nothing about it.

The issue on how to train teachers to educate students about the impact of bullying stood out. As a teacher, I know I am sometimes not the best person to handle a situation that a student may be going through. Dr. Phil and other psychologists on the show support the idea of building bullying into the curriculum. The idea being, that by training teachers to handle and discuss issues with bullying and addressing the issue school-wide, will make students more aware of the effects that negative comments have on other individuals.

While this idea sounds great, what happens when students are out of school? With cell phones and the Internet, bullying now extends beyond the school walls. Some children now deal with bullying 24/7. So while, the schools may be able to fight against verbal harassment at school, it is going to take a broader approach to deal with bullying overall. It was very disheartening hearing parents talk about their children who felt that the only escape from bullying was suicide. Hopefully, during National Bullying Awareness Month, we can begin to have discussions with our students about bullying.

In my classroom, I plan to incorporate conversations on bullying into the weekly discussions I have on Fridays with my classes. I teach middle school, and bullying is very present with this age group of children and is detrimental to their self-image if not handled quickly.

The Solution Is Simple?

After seeing “Waiting for Superman,” I walked away with hopes, but also with new concerns for Baltimore City Schools. As the credits rolled and my eyes cleared, I read the final comments that scrolled across the screen. While I believe these words were meant to inspire, I was mostly concerned. One comment that caused my head to tilt in confusion and forced me to reread was “The solution is simple.” After almost 2 hours of watching and just over 1 year in the classroom, one of the last conclusions that I have come to is that “the solution is simple.” While there are a number of undeniable take-aways that I feel most of the audience would agree on, I do not think the simplicity of this injustice is one of them. In fact, one of the strengths of the film for me was that it addressed the complexity of the issue, as well as its urgency and importance.

I walked out of the theater thinking about one of the most touched upon topics of the film, charter schools. There is no question in my mind that charter schools have made a significant and undeniable contribution to Baltimore City and are critical to solving the education crisis in our city. However, I am deeply troubled that charter schools will become the solution to this complex problem. It is my fear that the public and those who work in education will latch onto charter schools as their “superman.”

As the film highlights, there are charter schools that are changing the lives of students. It also makes it heartbreakingly clear that there is not enough space for each student who deserves such an education. It also points out the fact that not all charter schools are fulfilling their promise of a great education. We cannot ignore these facts in search of a simple solution.

This injustice is huge. It affects millions of students, their families and our city and nation. One of the challenges to solving the problem is that we must solve this problem to scale. I believe charter schools will be a major contributor to the solution and should continue to grow to reach more and more students. However, we cannot rely solely on one approach. There is no one quick fix. Not every school will be, should be, or can be a charter school. It is necessary, as we work to provide every student with a quality education, that we do not forgot the other schools. As a teacher in a neighborhood school that is not succeeding as it should, I feel there is a lot to be learned from many charter schools and their successes. However, my students should not be pushed to the side because there were not the “lucky ones” or because they have not had the opportunity to attend a charter school. Many neighborhood schools are not succeeding, but rather than divert our focus, we must change these schools for the students that attend them. I firmly believe neighborhood schools can have success and I see it happening in our city. My students deserve the best and they can succeed. Our solution needs to reach all students, including those who will attend neighborhood schools. They deserve a “superman” too and we cannot forget them.

Take a Chance on Me (Tentative Agreement)

After reading the new BTU tentative agreement, I was reminded of a scene from The Office where Andy sings ABBA's single "Take a Chance on Me" in order to court Angela. The lyrics "...Gonna do my very best and it ain't no lie/If you put me to the test, if you let me try..." are especially appropriate considering that the agreement is a form of merit pay.

In sum, the tentative agreement is huge change from the "traditional" step progression of the last few years. Under the step system, teachers receive incremental pay increases based on years of experience and their level of education determines the bracket in which their step falls. However, under the proposed system, teachers' pay is determined by Achievement Unites (AUs). AUs are earned by a scaled evaluation, professional development, graduate courses, and in some cases professional services. It also splits teachers into 4 categories, new hires, professional teachers, model teachers, and lead teachers, each with advancing pay scales.

The most tenuous of the terms is the vaugness of the actual evaluation system. Under Maryland's application for Race to the Top and new state law, 50% of a teacher's evaluation is based on "student achievement". The biggest problem is that there is no clear way to measure student achievement as outlined in the proposal. The tentative agreement also grants that evaluations are to be determined. I can only speak for the climate of my school but this seems to be the biggest sticking point of the entire agreement.

The trend in school reform does indeed seem to point towards merit pay and student achievement based evaluations. That said, it is my position that we take a chance on this contract for several reasons. First, there are protections in place for those worried about the evaluations including 50% BTU representation on the team that develops the system of evaluations. Second, the agreement outlines 3 years of implementation that includes a review at the end. If this system does not positively affect student achievement then we will revert to the step system with no loss of any salary increases. Third, those who do evaluations are required to be trained int he new system to ensure consistency. Finally, the agreement outlines system called the School Based Option, which allows teachers more autonomy and decision making at the school level.

Baltimore could really benefit from this contract as it is progressive and a major city of interest when it comes to reform. If Baltimore passes this contract, many other cities would watch in anticipation as to the positive effects of the reform. Baltimore may see a wider selection of teacher candidates and the return of veterans who left the field because of lower pay.

Overall, the tentative agreement empowers teachers while focusing on student achievement. Both are things that most educators would agree are important to a healthy school system. Sometimes you just have to take a chance.

Cult of Personality

Prior to my entry into teaching I was a political science major and studied this idea of a cult of personality. Basically it is the phenomenon where a person's accomplishments are out paced by their reputation. In other words the myth is greater than the person.

I find this an interesting part of Michelle Rhee. I was listening to an interview with her conducted by the Washington Post's Jo-Ann Armao. The first part of the interview discusses whether she is staying, she does not stay firmly either way. However, a quote from this first segment caught my attention. Rhee stated that some in the city feel like "If Vincent Gray really cares about school reform, then he'll keep Michelle Rhee." Rhee goes on to say that this is not her feelings on the subject and she actually states she wants to set it up so good things will continue even if she's not there.

With that said, I think there are some people who feel D.C. Public Schools will slide back without Michelle Rhee. This is where the cult of personality comes in. Michelle Rhee has accomplished a great many things as Chancellor of D.C. Public Schools, however she is just one person. Of course, reform will go on whether she is there or not. Michelle Rhee is not the only person who can make school reform happen and I think often we pin our hopes too much to one single person. I think about this fact when I here people talk about Dr. Alonso. I have often heard people say that if Dr. Alonso was ever to leave all the progress BCPSS has made would be lost. While Dr. Alonso has done a great deal, he is not the only person working for school reform and improvement. School reform is a movement. It requires millions of people; teachers and administrators, school district leaders and parents, and of course, students. Much as the film Waiting for "Superman" states there is no one person or "superman" who can save us, we're all in this together.

Baltimore City Wins National Award

On Thursday, September 30, Baltimore City Schools was announced as the 2010 winner of the Council of Urban Boards of Education Annual Award for Urban School Board Excellence. The award recognizes Baltimore City for the hard work that board members, staff, principals, and teachers have put in to improve student achievement. The award also acknowledges that significant achievement gains have been made, enrollment has been increased, and the city has people rallying around the cause.
I agree that much talk and effort has been focused on closing achievement gaps and increasing student attendance, engagement, and success. I know that from my personal experience at my school, I am surrounded by many talented and effective teachers and faculty members who are deicated to holding students to high standards and closing the achievement gap. People are invested in transforming schools and helping our stdents reach high levels of academic achievement.
In the press release it states that "Baltimore City Public Schools are now thriving." Although I see examples of people committed to making improvements, I do not agree with this statement. When I hear the word "thriving," I think of schools where almost all students are fully invested in their classes and their actions relfect this mindset; I see high test scores and students who have been able to grow academically so that they are on grade level. I hear stories of others' schools, and even in my own school, the situation is not perfect. Fights are still taking place, students are still cutting class, and student are still struggling to meet their full potential and are behind academically. I have only been teaching in Baltimore City for about a year and do not know how conditions were like in the past, so I cannot say that large improvements have not been made. However, I do not think we are where we want to be. I believe that our system can continue to improve and I think that we are starting to move in that direction as Baltimore City employees continue to do great things for their students.

"School-based" options in new contract

As with most teachers in City Schools, I was excited to see the basic outline for the new contract that was just agreed between BTU and BCPS. Our school system is about to transform, it seems, away from tenure= more money, to a tenure-will-matter-a-bit-but-evaluations-will-actually-determine-opportunities-for-pay-increases. There are many more details that need to come out about the ways to move from 'standard' to 'professional' to 'model', although a basic outline of the contract (that has not been released to all as of yet) shows that advancing between those levels will be based on acquiring (12) AUs, or achievement units, based upon evaluations, college credit accrual (I believe...), and "other approved AUs".

This is exciting, but there was another change imbedded within this new contract. The idea of the "school based" option allowing teachers at a school to approve/deny pay increases for a longer work day/more planning time/etc. is very interesting. It seems, to which the article alludes, that schools are being given more autonomy and more specifically that we may see more "charter school" like implementations at City Schools. I wonder if this will open the door to individual schools becoming increasingly autonomous. What is there to stop other statutes from being approved/implemented outside of the realm of a teacher contract? I don't know how the decision-making process at North Avenue works for these processes, but I am interested to see where these options go.

I foresee changes at schools that draw teachers to different schools, perhaps homogenizing certain teacher personalities/qualities. Schools may implement certain teacher workday changes that attract various types of teachers. We already have some schools that have mostly veteran or, more commonly, mostly new teachers. I wonder if this will further change the teacher makeup at City Schools. Where might this lead?

The Case for TFA

There always seems to be a question about whether Teach for America is doing more harm than good. One side of the argument claims that TFA teachers are under-qualified and will simply leave after their two-year commitment is up. They claim that TFA takes away from more qualified teachers and they are only sustaining the problem of continuing to give BCPSS students a poor education due to the lack of new teacher ability. People who are pro-TFA state that they are bringing in a crop of intelligent and dedicated teachers who are masters of their content and committed to change. In the interest of full disclosure, I am a TFA teacher in my second year of teaching. While TFA does have many, many, many flaws, I do believe that TFA is a great benefit to the city.

Many people claim that traditional education programs give better pedagogy training and I completely agree. TFA’s pedagogy training is weak and inefficient. In my experience though I have found that traditional programs do not train their teachers to be effective masters of the content and these teachers are unable to teach the significant themes and ideas prevalent to subjects because they themselves do not understand it. While most TFA teachers will leave the profession and never look back, a great many of them will stay and go on to be master teacher’ and experts of the craft. This year’s Baltimore City Teacher of the Year is a TFA alum and proof that TFA teachers can become leaders in the region.

When TFA entered Baltimore the city already had a failing education system, and it was those traditional teaching programs that led us into that failing education system. TFA is simply alternative to traditional programs that led Baltimore into this problem. While change is scary to those who will lose power and influence, (a.k.a. bloated and ineffective traditional education programs, and jaded veterans) it is necessary if we want to give the children of Baltimore an effective education.

Environmental Education in the Classroom

Last Tuesday it was unanimously decided upon that all school districts in Maryland need to begin including courses on environmental education. This will only affect high schools around the state and will likely take the form of environmental education being injected into biology courses. While this is a step in the right direction I ultimately believe more needs to be done. Growing up in Florida, throughout my entire K-12 education I received some form of environmental education. If Maryland really wants to make a difference they need to adopt this model of making it more than just a small piece of some high school biology class, but a fully integrated part of the curriculum. There is no reason that environmental education can’t work its way into reading, math, or civics courses, and ultimately Maryland school districts need to start offering schools with fully integrated programs to their students. If districts don’t begin to create these kinds of schools then we are potentially not nourishing the interests and goals of the next Jacque Cousteau or Ansel Adams. Students need to be learning about their effect on the environment and how it shaped by the public and private sectors in all classes. While teaching conservation and protecting wildlife may be seen as promoting a specific agenda, I ultimately think that since both of these ideas are promoted by the EPA there is nothing wrong with bringing them into schools. This new law was a healthy start but Maryland needs to stop patting themselves on the back and start doing more.

Merit Pay for teachers

Since this week we are discussing Merit Pay for teachers, this seemed like an interesting topic to blog on. There was a recent Washington Post Article (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/21/AR2010092103413_pf.html (from tuesday) that comments on a new study about merit pay and student achievement. This study found no significant gain in student achievement. It was a study done over three years in Nashville and compared two groups of teachers, 1 was eligible for a bonuses based on test scores while the other was not. The study found no significant difference in test scores except in the 6th grade. However, critics of the study argue that it misses two of the major purposes of merit pay which are teacher retention and getting a wider range of applicants to teaching jobs. They argue that merit pay would get more of the brightest into teaching because they could be earning comparable pay to their counterparts in other professions.

Obama has significantly increased support for merit pay but without any significant evidence to show its effectiveness. I think the critics of the study make valid arguments for why the study is not comprehensive but the study does seem to suggest that changes such as merit pay are not going to be stand alone answers to the problems of education. It is going to have to be a bundle of changes that are made together to significantly change the state of our education system.

Where is Superman?

"Either the kids are getting stupider every year, or there is something wrong with the education system." Quoted in the trailer for "Waiting for Superman", Geoffrey Canada relates what we know as a society all too well: our country's school system is failing many of our childrens' present and future. The fundamental discussion, of course, is not the "what", because this is evident in drop-out and HS graduation rates, standardized testing scores, and countless anecdotal accounts from teachers in countless regions across America.

I would like to argue that the current question isn't even the "how"; we are exploring countless options, from charter schools to lottery systems, from national standards to teacher programs such as Teach for America and Baltimore City Teaching Residency. The current question is the "what trajectory are we currently on?" We can't examine how to best go about solving this multi-faceted, mind-boggling epidemic when we are still trying a plethora of options, few of which are unequivocally 'successful'. In this way, we haven't gotten to the point yet where we as educators, policy makers, and stakeholders (that's everyone) can say that we have a plan but just not the resources or the manpower.

No, what I think we need to do now is examine what kind of path this current "experimental" stage of reform is taking us on--we are really still in its infant state. What is the current state of school reform with respect to charter schools? Are charter schools that are essentially independent from the public school system the most effective? Will national standards help ease the stress from state or local school districts and allow resources to flow better elsewhere? What can attempting to seed clones of Harlem Children's Zone in other cities do there?

There are many questions, and of course I don't have many (or most) of the answers. These answers are also on the huge scale, when we have so much more to worry about on the micro (school/district/classroom) level. I am excited to see Waiting for Superman to see if it asks some of these questions in a way that makes it unavoidable for us as a country not to discuss them. We know the flame is lit and the discussion has started. I hope we are asking the right questions and not trying to accomplish everything as individuals, on small scales, in ways that are difficult to replicate or analyze. Mostly I hope that we can be glad that so many people care but realize that intentions don't get a student to achieve what they really need.

Paying For College

As a high school teacher, I encourage all of my students, from ninth to twelfth grade, to consider how their actions can help them get into college. Some of my students tell me that they have other plans, or that college isn’t for them, but I feel like part of my job is to encourage my students to pursue options that will lead them to a lifetime of learning and growing academically after high school ends. This is the experience I had in high school, and I want my students to have the same encouragement that was a part of my life.

My concern for my students is that I’m setting them up for a lifetime of debt. (See the recent article in The Baltimore Sun titled “Growing Concern for Students Overwhelmed by Education Loans"). The advice that I received when I was in high school was to simply worry about getting into college, and that I could easily pay off the debt later, with a combination of small government-sponsored loans and high-paying scholarships. Well, the world is a different place now, and many students now leave college with considerable debt and decreased means with which they might pay it off.

In addition to encouraging my students to go to college, I think it is just as much my duty to encourage students to take advantage of financial counseling provided by colleges. College is an expensive undertaking and I would hate for any of my students who have worked so hard to get in to have to leave for financial reasons that they could have predicted. I hope that the guidance department at my school is similarly watching out for the seniors as they get into college.

The challenge for me will be to give this advice in a way that still encourages my students to attend college, or pursue some other avenue that will allow them to continue to grow academically.

Baltimore’s Magnet Schools in Question; Implications for BCPSS Reputation

One of the greatest stigmas against Baltimore’s educational system (or any urban system, for that matter) is the “zip code effect”: the notion that students are confined to the educational institutes in close proximity to their residences, for better or for worse.

Today, Baltimore’s three most prestigious high schools – City, Poly, and Western – are defying that stigma, proudly accepting students based on academic merit rather than domestic location.

Might that change, though? If recent media reports are correct, Alonso and BCPSS might not have so much boasting power that students actually are capable of an excellent education via a magnet setting. A recent Sun article explored the recent declining SAT test scores of these three schools, and exposed their startlingly low college graduation rates (39% and 46% for City and Poly, respectively). The article continues,“The quality of those schools… is a drawing card that attracts families to Baltimore.” I’d argue that these schools not only represent a hope for potential new residents, but they also represent a hope for Baltimore natives who would otherwise be forced to attend a zoned school within the proximity of their residence.

If City, Western, and Poly can no longer boast impressive college graduation rates, SAT scores, or (at the very least) an HSA passing rate competitive with the state of Maryland, Baltimore City Schools might receive even more criticism from those who claim that BCPSS can no longer boast a way for students to reach academic heights by their merit and determination. Some might argue that, for the sake of students in the district, it’s imperative that these schools remain enduring, educational strongholds.

BTU Contract Under Review, Merit Pay?

Earlier this week Baltimore City Public Schools announced that negotiations for a new contract between BTU and the school district are ongoing; for the time being, the city will use the contract from the 2009-2010 school year until the details of the current contract are fleshed out. Many changes that Dr. Alonso is pushing for arose from a third party evaluation/consultation of the school district performed in June. The evaluation suggested that teachers’ pay be increased; however, it also criticized the current contract for its emphasis on tenure over performance as well as the city’s tendency to circulate unwanted yet tenured teachers rather than cutting ties with them. One of the most provocative reforms under scrutiny involves teacher pay. Dr. Alonso has suggested that the new contract will imbue a “remarkable re-conception of how teachers get paid." The city schools’ CEO has attempted to allay fears from critics by stating that teacher pay will reflect student growth rather than raw scores on a standardized test. How he plans to measure student growth was not mentioned.

Most of me likes the idea of merit based pay, at least in theory. I agree that basing pay solely on the number of years you have served a school district appears to give teachers no incentive to continually evaluate and improve upon their effectiveness. From the same standpoint, the current pay system does not reward the best teachers for their amazing efforts. In other words, to the best of my knowledge, I do not know of any incentive based bonuses that Baltimore City currently offers. Some critics to the possible change in the pay scale cite reasons that usually shift responsibility. Others cite the idea that not every subject is evaluated with a standardized test. And part of me does seriously question the degree to which human nature will be involved, especially pertaining to teacher evaluations for those educators who teach non-tested subjects. Suppose an amazing art teacher butts heads with her principal and severs their relationship. I guess you could set up some system for appeal and encourage teachers to preserve both student created and teacher created artifacts that can be used as evidence for their effectiveness. An extremely convoluted situation remains, nonetheless.

Was Maryland's Selection as a Finalist to Obama's Race to the Top Initiative Unfair?

As Maryland has recently qualified as a finalist for the Obama administration’s Race to the Top stimulus grant competition, many aspersions have been levied against the state for the previous failures in a number of school systems. In particular, critics point to the fact that Maryland was ranked 35th in data quality and 40th in the promotion of charter schools (by the Department of Education). Additionally, it is noted that while Maryland has increased education spending by $1.3 billion over the last decade, the increase of spending has “done nothing for students” in Prince George’s County and Baltimore.
In particular, an editorial in the Washington Examiner suggests that the criteria for selecting the winners of the Race to the Top competition should have rewarded school districts who have made progress in terms of educational innovation. The writer points specifically to New Orleans’ Recovery School District’s status as the “top ‘reform friendly’ school district in the nation” as well as Colorado for its implementation of innovative school reform.
Others have also argued that due to the current economic hardships plaguing our country, stimulus money spent in the form of a competition is irresponsible and unfair. Proponents of this position have espoused that each state has an equal right to claim their share of the money.
I am not very well versed in the progress that Louisiana and Colorado has had educationally in the past few years. I understand that Maryland as a whole has a very good reputation in terms of its educations systems, particularly regarding graduation rates. Further, while the editorial vaguely points to the idea that the extra money spent on Maryland education over the past ten years has “done nothing for students” in Baltimore, I have heard from other sources that Baltimore’s graduation rate as of last year is at a fifty year high. I just wonder how much of the author’s claims are based on real data and how much of the claim is based on second hand generalizations.

Should the Ability to Reconcile Be a Requirement of Rhee's Position?

With the DC primary election looming three days away, DC journalists, officials, and educators continue to voice their concerns in desperation for their cause: it's assumed that a win for mayoral candidate Adrian Fenty will guarantee that Michelle Rhee will stay in office, while a win for Vince Gray would precede the end of her leadership of DCPS.

Three days before the election is arguably the most important time for both sides to make their final case, so such arguments merit our attention now more than ever. The Washington Post's Colbert I. King makes an especially interesting point, citing Rhee's inability to reconcile racial tension. He laments, "Rhee's poll numbers… are in the pits among black residents." After Rhee campaigned in predominantly white districts this weekend, King continued, "How can black parents now trust her to be fair? Regardless of Tuesday's outcome at the polls, Michelle Rhee should clean out her desk."

Although Colbert uses no data on students, schools, achievement, or even financial efficiency, some, like Colbert, argue that Rhee’s support among racial lines has become increasingly polarized. Should Rhee’s ability to “extend the olive branch" to all people be a prerequisite for Rhee's right to retain her position? To what extent does this factor matter amidst the greater goal of getting our students to succeed in the classroom?

Although specifics are not as heated at the moment, this topic also could apply to Baltimore city. Like Rhee, BCPSS superintendent Andres Alonso is not of the same race as the majority of the students he serves, but yet, he has not received the same scrutiny. Why is Rhee the subject of such criticism while Alonso is not?

Are Maryland teacher's unions being too resistant to change?

http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/bs-md-maryland-schools-number-one-20100422,0,758859.story

In her recent Baltimore Sun article, Liz Bowie calls into question Maryland’s number one ranking by Education Week, wondering if Maryland is doing all it can to advance with school reform. Among the questions are that of whether or not the poor relationship between the governor and the state superintendent has prevented them from presenting “a united front,” and also the degree to which strong unions in Maryland are responsible for resisting reform.

The more I look, the more I see pay for performance measures advancing. Charter schools and merit-pay programs have apparently been typically supported by politicians to the political right, but, as we all know, the Obama administration also supports these pursuits and the result is that they’re happening all over. We are all also familiar with the argument that teacher’s unions often thwart change and with it, progress by maintaining positions that protect teachers and not students. In my personal opinion, though a strong union may resist change, that is not the same as opposing change. It is clear that strong unions in Maryland have not prevented an increasing number of jurisdictions (and the Maryland state legislature) from beginning to tie student achievement to teacher evaluation. As these experiments are conducted and good practices are explored and established, the teacher’s unions will respond, slowly, with greater openness. It may be a lofty challenge to sway the collective will of the teachers toward adopting reforms such as pay for performance, but it is a worthy one because winning the support of the unions will entail advancement to the transition stage mentioned by Beverly Anderson in her 1993 article on the stages of systemic change in schools, where the school policies as a whole begin to tip toward the new vision. It may well be that teacher’s unions will protect teachers and students by tempering the process of transition in such as way as to ensure it’s sustainability.

Q-Comp

In 2004, Republican Governor Tim Pawlenty of Minnesota made a series of education proposals, which included elements like performance pay for teachers and changes to teacher quality evaluation meant to help weed out ineffective teachers. Apparently, Pawlenty was disappointed to have only gotten through performance pay, in the form of Q-Comp, which is in operation in forty-four Minnesota school districts.

This is of great interest to me because I think that performance pay represents a necessary paradigm-shift. I think schools have already given themselves a chance in the last decade by rising to pay teachers a salary they can at least live off of, on which a family could conceivably survive. Schools are perhaps going to be able to exploit some of the momentum our generation is seeing built up (by us, in part) and could progress further, paying teachers fairly, rewarding those who are effective, identifying those who are not. In this way schools can invest in effective teachers and effective practices. It’s a myth that performance pay must be enslaved to standardized test scores. In Minnessota, schools have to propose a plan which satisfies about five different criteria, including job-embedded professional development and a stipulation that performance pay for teachers line up with a minimum of 60% of increases across the system. It didn’t offer too many detail, because it would seem those details are up to the schools or jurisdictions that are proposing to implement them. When these criteria are met, the schools in question receive and average of $200 additional per student.

Teachers need to address bullying: But how?

Before setting up my classroom in my first year of teaching, I was advised to develop a positive classroom culture in my classes. This made complete sense to me as an end goal, but still left me with the question of “how?” Throughout my first year, and into my second year, I have still struggled with this question of how. As a ninth grade teacher, I find that many of my students enter the classroom in the fall with their own set attitudes, behaviors, and habits, both positive and negative. I must shape all of these to fit in with what I had envisioned as a positive classroom. But how?

Baltimore City Public Schools have recently caught the attention of the country due to a few incidents of bullying which have gone too far. On Monday, Dr. Alonso released a statement addressing the issue of bullying. In it, he places the responsibility of addressing bullying on teachers, parents, and the community as a whole.

As a classroom teacher, I agree with his statement. Teachers only work with their students a certain number of hours in a day. When students leave the school building, they are also easily influenced by others they encounter, and the influences of the teachers do not necessarily follow the student. There is a need for the families and community to address the issue of bullying.

As I was told before my first year of teaching, I need to address bullying in the classroom and create a positive classroom environment. But I was never told how, and trust me, I struggled with this task. For new teachers, and even veteran teachers, I think it would be incredibly helpful to provide professional development about how to create this positive classroom culture. Strategies, examples, and modeling could be shared to provide teachers with an idea of where to begin. Because bullying is such an important thing to address, among other issues within a classroom, I think teachers need to be provided with a basic knowledge of how to develop classroom culture in order to better address these issues before they begin.

Evaluating Teachers: Let the Riots Begin

Maryland Superintendent Nancy Grasmick came up with an ingenious new plan this week that would force schools to link teacher evaluations to student achievement. For some reason, she thinks that teachers ought to be judged by how well their students perform. More specifically, she thinks that at least 50 percent of a teacher's evaluation ought to be based on their students' achievement. (The definition of “achievement” it yet to be determined, but one can assume it will mean students’ performance on standardized tests.) Where on Earth would she ever get such an idea? Why should teachers be judged on how well their students perform? Shouldn’t they just have job security because they have served their time in the system, sat through hours of professional development and staff meetings over the years, dealt with parent upon parent, and written hundreds of lesson plans? Why do they need to actually be good at what they do? Isn’t it good enough that just show up at work everyday?

Well, thankfully the whole Race To The Top movement and national push to get better test scores and see real student achievement is getting to Grasmick. And she, along with several other schools administrators around the country, are making real strides to get qualified, successful educators into classrooms and try to combat the issues plaguing countless schools around the country.

And the unrest in teachers’ lounges and at union meetings throughout Maryland can now begin (that’s to say there were at one time peaceful and calm environments). One teacher (who put in her 34 years) wrote into the Sun.story saying that it’s not realistic to tie student success to teachers because teachers cannot be expected to produce growth in troubled children. I can imagine that in the near future, several more teachers and union leaders will speak out against the proposal in similar ways. And many will attempt to chip away at Grasmick’s plan and create negotiations so as to prevent strikes and keep everyone calm.

It seems so counterintuitive to me that so many teachers and teacher unions are steadfastly opposed to the idea of linking teacher evaluations to student success. I would think that all teachers would want to be in the company of successful teacher and would want to reassured that all of their co-workers are there for a common purpose: creating better students. It is understandable for people to get frustrated over the fact that their job is linked almost solely on a single test, but if students aren’t learning (meaning teachers aren’t accomplishing their main duty while at work) then teachers should be let go. Why is this so hard for teachers to accept?

If Maryland really wants to see real change and produce real growth in its students, then, yes, it’s probably going to mean letting teachers who have been around for 34 years clean out their classrooms and let someone else try. And, unfortunately, it’s also probably going to mean enduring several riots from teachers in the process.

Finally More Money in the Budget 4.27 Post

http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/education/bs-ci-school-budget-20100414,0,7361987.story


This seems to finally be what looks like good news, in term of the much talked about Baltimore City Public School Systems budget. The Baltimore City school board voted recently to adopt a $1.23 billion budget for the next academic year that will increase the amount of funding for students and continue shifting control over spending from the central office to principals. In its adoption of the 2011 budget, proposed by schools CEO Andres Alonso, the system will spend about $200 more per student next year. However, that extra money will come from a decrease in the amount of additional funds the district provides in extra educational services for students who have disabilities, fall behind in achievement, are advanced or are at risk for dropping out. For example, students with disabilities this year received an additional $1,282 per student; next year, those students will receive an additional $641. The board will also eliminate 15 vacant positions in the school system's central office and put the $637,000 saved back into the pot for city principals to use. Wow! The per student funding will increase; does this mean that achievement will increase for the students? Money in the hands of principals, will this be misappropriated like it was at the central office or are principals now budget specialist as well as educators? This makes me question if the principals are qualified to control their budgets, do they get any training or are they just going from their gut? The increased money sounds great in the news, I guess only time will tell if the students benefit from the increased spending.